Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Long-term outcomes of adjacent and antagonistic teeth after implant restoration: a focus on patient-related factors

Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 2021³â 51±Ç 2È£ p.135 ~ 143
¹Ú¼ö¿¬, ±è¿ë°Ç, ¼­Á¶¿µ, À̵ÎÇü, ÀÌÀç¸ñ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Ú¼ö¿¬ ( Park Su-Yeon ) - Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry Department of Periodontology
±è¿ë°Ç ( Kim Yong-Gun ) - Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry Department of Periodontology
¼­Á¶¿µ ( Suh Jo-Young ) - Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry Department of Periodontology
À̵ÎÇü ( Lee Du-Hyeong ) - Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
ÀÌÀç¸ñ ( Lee Jae-Mok ) - Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry Department of Periodontology

Abstract


Purpose: To investigate factors affecting the antagonistic and adjacent teeth in patients after implant restoration and prosthetic rehabilitation.

Methods: In total, 160 patients who visited Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital for implant surgery, prosthesis placement, and supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) were included in this study. The average follow-up period was 88.06 months, and the maximum was 175 months. Patients¡¯ history of smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and osteoporosis was investigated, and panoramic radiographs were taken after surgery and prosthetic treatment. During the follow-up period, extraction and prosthetic/endodontic treatments of the antagonistic and adjacent teeth were analyzed. The statistical analyses were performed using descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, the Fisher exact test, and multiple logistic regression analyses.

Results: Treatment was performed on 29.4% of the studied antagonistic teeth with extraction performed in 20.0% and prosthetic treatment in 10.0%. Furthermore, 19.4% of the studied adjacent teeth underwent treatment, of which extraction was performed in 12.5% and prosthetic treatment in 7.5%. The treatment rate for adjacent teeth was 25.3% in smokers, which was higher than that of non-smokers (12.3%) (P=0.039). Patients who were non-adherent to SPT showed a significantly higher rate (19.6%) of antagonistic prosthetic treatment than did those who were adherent (5.5%) (P=0.006).

Conclusions: Implant restoration can affect the adjacent and antagonistic teeth. Smoking, osteoporosis history, and absence of SPT may be risk factors for the treatment of the adjacent and antagonistic teeth.

Å°¿öµå

Dental implants; Dental prosthesis; Follow-up studies; Patient compliance; Survival; Treatment outcome

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed